

Powered by
Teklogin
copyright 2004©
www.prlsamp.org
|
|
A Summary of the Procedure to Create Special Indexes and
Indicators in a Retrospective |
|
Cohort Study of Science, Technology,
Engineering, and Mathematics Students |
Creating a Retrospective Cohort Study
Request from the Registrar
the number of copies of the transcripts of randomly selected students you
decide on, who fit the criteria of the study, covering any personal
identification material in the copy. For example, first-time, full-time
students entering in the fall of 1994 who were admitted in Chemistry, or
with a preference for Chemistry, or who declared as Chemistry majors at
their first opportunity (if the institution does not admit by major). Make
sure to set the entrance date sufficiently far in the past to allow for
resolution of their academic career, remembering that today’s students may
take up to seven years to graduate in STEM fields.
Back to Top
Decide what data to record, and
have reliable workers do it manually from transcripts provided by the
Registrar if a computerized system does not yet exist at the institution.
Extract from the transcripts
data relating to the pertinent variables relating to the final disposition
of the student (creating a worksheet such as that presented in the manual):
graduation date and status at time of graduation (major, average in major,
and GPA), or year leaving and average in major and GPA at time of leaving.
Review the transcripts again,
noting all courses where students obtained an unsatisfactory grade. The
compilation of these courses constitutes a list of candidates for problem
courses.
When all data on student
performance in these courses is collected, it will be evident which courses
are truly problem courses -- those causing significant disruption in student
pursuit of timely graduation. This may take into account how many students
were affected, what percentage of students were affected, how seriously
students were affected, etc.
Compile a list of the results of
the first attempt in these problem courses (in a worksheet).
Place those results in the
appropriate columns (2, 3, 5, 7, and 8) of a Student Performance in Problem
Courses spreadsheet.
Enter the appropriate formulas
in the remaining columns to calculate the inferred values*, completing the
Student Performance in Problem Courses table.
Back to Top
Determine what results are
significant, developing hypotheses and/or explanations, and providing a
meaningful description of the data. The manual offers some ideas on how to
do this. A review of one important area of conclusions with a substantial
subjective component is the “Brain Drain.”
Calculating the Brain
Drain
Identifying a “brain drain” is relatively subjective and speculative.
Constructing the data base requires only that for each STEM student who
leaves before graduating, data is registered on the major, the GPA, and the
number of credits of the departing student. Then the cases are ranked (within
majors, if so desired), to see if a pattern emerges.
Based
on subjective judgment, assisted by the patterns, groups of students are
categorized as possessing modest, good, or outstanding GPAs and minimal,
modest, or substantial numbers of credits to create categories. They can
then be classified as “highly probable,” “likely,” “possible,” or “unlikely”
to be participants in a brain drain from the institution in question.
*Calculating the inferred values:
Stymie Rate
To
calculate the Stymie Rate take the number of students who took a particular
course (head count, counting individuals only once, no matter how many times
they took the course) and divide this sum by the number who never
passed it in satisfactory fashion (usually defined as passing with an A, B,
or C).
ICE Number
For
each (high-risk) course, divide the number of students taking the course by
the number that complete the course with a satisfactory grade (usually A, B,
or C). Each time a student takes a course counts separately. Student
equivalents rather than one-time head count are appropriate, since each
attempt represents a cost to the institution in terms of course space.
Back to Top
|